Wicked Problems Social Policy in America on Equality Essay

Wicked Problems Social Policy in America on Equality - Essay poserThey were able to work educate themselves and rise in society. Social policies do not address the sociological issues, they answer at a very superficial level the end problems dealing with inequality and and not within inequality. Meritocracy and Egalitarism cannot be achieved as it assumes that we are not unique individuals. Three issues we be covered bequest issues in Elite colleges, Blacks fail in law crop and Gay marriages. In concluding a summary will be made, confirming when the government gets involved, social groups suffer. Much argument has been in the advocate about alumni accepting legacy preferences. Legacy preferences currently is not covered by Affirmative litigate but the government is looking to pass legislation to a lower place the The Civil Rights Act of 1866 which preventing discrimination ground on ancestry and on race. (Wise 2010) I personally dont think the issue should be addressed at the government level. An alumni child has a 20% more chance of being accepted in his parents school. Is this not human nature?(Kahlenberg 2010) Currently in France, it is policy in order to apply for a job, the applier has the right to omit all information indicating his race, background or religion. If the US were to do the same, then the College applicant still has the SAT scores. A parent, who has come from an Elite college, will have given his child a good background thus the best preparation possible for the SAT. Empirically it is impossible to statistically test, if legacy preference is an indication of acceptance. If Elite colleges were to strictly apply affirmative action, it would be at the detriment of under qualified students. A study done by Standford University found that 33% of black law school graduates in California pass the bar exam on the first try and most neer become lawyers. (Kahlenberg 2010)T he question at hand is to prepare black students before they get to Un iversity so they are not in the situation to fail. Gay Marriages implies that the innovation of marriages is completely eroded. If 1 in 2 children will suffer a divorced marriage, the question is not allowing gay marriages but why is the sentiment of marriage having degraded to such a deplorable level. (Frum 1997 ) The Social Structure and concept of marriage is the truly problem. There is no longer the social structure within the religion which checks and balances each relationship to pick out sure people and equalizes gruntle on the right track. Gay marriages are a sign of society that the institution of marriage is even more insecure. Marriage used to be a means to stand children to make a life time bond to continue family legacies. Now it has become an exercise in radical autonomy. Affirmative Action and marriage do not go hand in hand. Bringing a child into the world assumes that the mother, normally the woman, plays a lower role in the couple as she has given up many of her equalitarian freedoms to raise her family. He proposes to make it harder to divorce to apprise in school the different roles of the sexes and to teach in sociology that it were socially acceptable, Government policy has nothing to do with it. David asks if homosexuals would really want to marry if they knew the complicated social structure it actually involved. It is hard work to stay married and happy. There is not the autonomy or the affirmative action in a marriage. An institution is meant to stand. The family is a sociological structure that has been long part of our society before the 50s. Those, who favor gay marriage, moldiness not have strong marriage themselves. A woman was built to have children and to rear children. by chance the word marriage is the issue. In some countries, laws have been passed legalizing the right to live